California’s Office of Administrative Law this week ruled that coffee can be exempt from Proposition 65 cancer warnings, reversing a decision that was made by California Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle in May 2018.
Berle had argued that since roasted coffee contains trace amounts of acrylamide, it fell under the Prop 65 rule. The decision met with quite a bit of backlash, prompted by groups including California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), National Coffee Association, and even the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
In August of 2018, the FDA stated that the Prop 65 coffee warning would mislead coffee consumers. “Such a warning could mislead consumers to believe that drinking coffee could be dangerous to their health when it actually could provide health benefits,” the FDA stated. “Misleading labeling on food violates the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. No state law can require food to bear a warning that violates federal law.”
The blog posts and e-newsletters from Lester & Cantrell, LLP are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Please contact our attorneys to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Lester & Cantrell, LLP and the user. Any opinions expressed on our blogs/e-newsletters are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.